GeoAISEO measures one narrow thing: what a machine actually receives when it
asks for one of your pages. Narrow is the point — it is where a surprising number of sites
quietly fail.
Why this exists
Most AI crawlers do not run JavaScript. If your content only appears after the page loads, those
crawlers receive the shell and nothing inside it. Unlike a ranking drop, nothing tells you: there
is no error, no red dashboard, no dip to explain — and the page looks perfect in every browser
you own.
So we fetch the page the way a crawler does and show you the difference, in raw material: the
status codes, the HTML that arrived, the text that was readable, the bytes that were not. That is
the whole product. You can run it on your own site in a few seconds.
How the checks are made
The rules are public. All 25 checks are listed with what
each one looks for, why it matters and how to fix it. A private rulebook would make our answers
unfalsifiable, and this site is not asking to be believed.
Every finding carries its evidence — so you can reproduce it yourself. If the
evidence does not hold up, the finding is wrong, and we want to hear about it.
The score is a count, not a prediction. It says how many rules passed. It says
nothing about what any particular model will do with your page. Rulesets are versioned, the
report names the version, and scores from different versions are not comparable.
We run it on ourselves. This site is checked with the same tool before we ask
you to point it at yours — the result is on the front page.
It behaves like a guest. We obey robots.txt, identify ourselves
in the User-Agent, rate-limit anonymous checks, and we do not ask for an email address in order
to show you a result.
What we won't claim
We won't sell you a score that predicts whether AI systems cite you. Nobody can compute that,
and a number you cannot reproduce is a vibe with a decimal point.
We won't say a passing site will be cited. Plenty of readable pages are never quoted,
and the reasons live outside the page.
We won't tell you this is legal, financial or professional advice. It is a technical reading of
one fetch. The terms state the same limits.
Who runs it
GeoAISEO is an independent project, and the address below reaches the people who write the rules.
That is also why a report that looks wrong to you is worth sending: corrections are how the
ruleset gets better, and they are cheaper for us than being wrong in public.
Contact
Email is the only channel we run:
reports@geoaiseo.com. No contact form, no phone number, no
ticket system — a form that fails is a black hole, and an email address is not. It is the same
address that sends your reports, so it is genuinely watched.
Things worth writing in about:
A finding you think is wrong. Send the report link and what you saw instead.
We can re-run the fetch and correct the rule.
A page we couldn't check — behind a login, blocked by a firewall, or
JavaScript-only. Send the URL and we'll tell you whether that is on our side or the site's.
Deleting something. A report or your email address — from
the privacy page you don't need to give a reason.
Something broken on this site: a generator that produced a bad file, a page
that renders wrong on your device, a link that goes nowhere.
You're a consultant and the output is missing what you'd hand to a client.
That feedback decides what gets built next; there is no roadmap committee to convince.
What to expect: everything gets read, and replies can take a few days — it is a small operation
and we would rather answer late and concretely than fast and vaguely.
What the service does and does not include: what we do.